GOV Inc. is a global problem and WE ARE THE SOLUTION! Help People wake up to the Economy-of-Fraud and Police State of America! We can end the corporate-free-for-all, wars-for-profit, tyranny & oppression when we unite. Remember, WE ARE MANY, THEY ARE FEW! WE OUTNUMBER THEM... MILLIONS-TO-ONE! PEACE
Though Ontario’s nurses’ union is questioning provincial officials over
how to protect its ranks from Ebola, nurses at London’s largest hospital
have forged an agreement that allows them to use respirators....
“Any nurse (here) has the right to choose their personal protective
equipment,” James Murray, president of Local 100 of the Ontario Nurses
Association (ONA)
Study at Queensland University of Technology dispels the myth that viruses only travel arms length-
excerpt-
Professor Morawska and a team of QUT scientists have been studying
the way droplets carrying viruses are dispersed in the air when people
speak, cough, sneeze and breathe. "The current belief is that if you are
an arm's length away from someone you are protected from any viruses
they might be carrying," she said. "When we talk about infection spread we are talking about droplets emitted from humans being dispersed in the air." As part of the study QUT designed and built a machine to measure the distance a droplet travels in the air prior to drying. "This droplet could potentially be carrying a virus," she said. "The
significant part of our research has found that rather than the droplet
falling directly to the ground after leaving the mouth, the liquid
component of the droplet dries in the air and the dry residue travels
large distances. "When a droplet dries in the air the residue is carried in the air,
and therefore there is a risk that people can inhale that air and become
infected." Professor Morawska said a droplet drying on a surface could be
infectious but the greater danger was droplets drying in the air. "A
droplet can travel for 10cm before it dries in the air, it doesn't
immediately fall to the ground."...
Study has shown the Ebola Zaire virus "can survive for long periods in different liquid
media and can also be recovered from plastic and glass surfaces at low
temperatures for over 3 weeks"
"When dried in tissue culture media onto glass and stored at 4 °C, Zaire ebolavirus survived for over 50 days"
or use the ONLY tried and true treatment for an Ebola outbreak, QUARANTINE!
============
See the previous postfor more on the suspicion of Ebola air-transmission, CDC lies and an important recommendation from CIDRAP: healthcare workers w/Ebola patients should wear respirators, not face-masks
======================
WHO: Ebola death toll at 3,439 with 7,492 cases recorded... [which could be 25% of actual numbers]. They say the amount of people infected in West Africa is doubling every 20 days... 5 new cases every hour in Sierra Leone and the majority of infected are still turned away from treatment centers in Liberia [seriously under-reported] . West Africa could easily have 2000 new cases every day by the end of the year...
and the flights keep coming.
See the dangerous implications of steady rates of growth:
CIDRAP: We believe there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.
Please read and share the
commentary from CIDRAP. It contains imperative information
that could save your life by saving the lives of our healthcare
workers. And it's pretty solid evidence the CDC is lying
Taking someone's temperature at the airport isn't nearly enough to keep Ebola away! Isolation is the only way to stop an Ebola outbreak, here or anywhere, yet Ebola treatment centers are turning away over 80% of the infected in Liberia (even though WHO has known for about 8 months). The situation in Sierra Leone isn't much better and it looks like the outbreak is about to erupt... supereruption... people are trying to flee, and the flights keep coming. Let officials know they must stop the senseless and dangerous decision making! Liberia needs isolations tents, food, medicine and trained staff, no one needs 3000 U.S. troops that are not haz-mat prepared or trained. CDC, well, I give up... they lie and their actions continually put the public at risk (Commerce Dammit Commerce). WHO has done a whole lot of not much and that's all that's required for bad things to happen. U.N. refuses to ban flights from Ebola-infected countries. U.N. spokesperson said "it's very important not to isolate these countries" as it would worsen their political and economic situations.
I say, it's very important TO ISOLATE THIS VIRUS and not doing so would worsen the political and economic situations OF THE WORLD and likely KILL MILLIONS MORE. He says aid groups need access to the region... I agree but THEY CAN USE CHARTER JETS!
Medical professionals should get together and demand respirators when treating Ebola patients. U.S. officials need to stop allowing people from affected countries to enter U.S. or require 21 day quarantine for them. This virus is too deadly to leave to a questionnaire or honor-system. Maybe the culling is all by design, maybe it is Agenda 21.
Doctor dons Ebola protection suit to protest ‘asleep at the wheel’ CDC
SHTF plan.com'When it hits the fan, don't say we didn't warn you'
Make a plan and work your emergency preparedness
Please read and share the
following commentary from CIDRAP. It contains imperative information
that could save your life by saving the lives of our healthcare
workers. And it's pretty solid evidence the CDC is lying
CIDRAP- Center for Infectious Disease Research
and Policy
Lisa M Brosseau, ScD, and Rachael Jones, PhD | Sep 17, 2014
Editor's Note: Today's commentary was
submitted to CIDRAP by the authors, who are national experts on respiratory
protection and infectious disease transmission. In May they published a similar
commentary on MERS-CoV. Dr Brosseau is a Professor and Dr
Jones an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Health, Division of
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, at the University
of Illinois at Chicago.
Healthcare workers play a very important role in the
successful containment of outbreaks of infectious diseases like Ebola. The
correct type and level of personal protective equipment (PPE) ensures that
healthcare workers remain healthy throughout an outbreak—and with the current
rapidly expanding Ebola outbreak in West Africa,
it's imperative to favor more conservative measures.
The precautionary principle—that any action designed to
reduce risk should not await scientific certainty—compels the use of
respiratory protection for a pathogen like Ebola virus that has:
No proven pre- or post-exposure treatment modalities
A high case-fatality rate
Unclear modes of transmission
We believe there is scientific and epidemiologic
evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious
aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which
means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks.1
The minimum level of protection in high-risk settings
should be a respirator with an assigned protection factor greater than 10. A
powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) with a hood or helmet offers many
advantages over an N95 filtering facepiece or similar respirator, being more
protective, comfortable, and cost-effective in the long run.
We strongly urge the US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to seek funds for the
purchase and transport of PAPRs to all healthcare workers currently fighting
the battle against Ebola throughout Africa—and beyond.
There has been a lot of on-line and published
controversy about whether Ebola virus can be transmitted via aerosols. Most
scientific and medical personnel, along with public health organizations, have
been unequivocal in their statements that Ebola can be transmitted only by
direct contact with virus-laden fluids2,3 and that the only modes of
transmission we should be concerned with are those termed "droplet"
and "contact."
These statements are based on two lines of reasoning.
The first is that no one located at a distance from an infected individual has
contracted the disease, or the converse, every person infected has had (or must
have had) "direct" contact with the body fluids of an infected
person.
This reflects an incorrect and outmoded understanding
of infectious aerosols, which has been institutionalized in policies, language,
culture, and approaches to infection control. We will address this below.
Briefly, however, the important points are that virus-laden bodily fluids may
be aerosolized and inhaled while a person is in proximity to an infectious
person and that a wide range of particle sizes can be inhaled and deposited
throughout the respiratory tract... READ MORE CRITICAL INFORMATION
